|
Jerry Mitchell: Finesse and the 4 D's
Tony-Winning Choreographer Brings "Legally Blonde" To Broadway Stage
By
Tony Phillips
|

Jerry Mitchell

From TonyAwards.com:
"Jerry Mitchell displays the technique
that helped him win the
Tony Award for Best Choreography
for La Cage aux Folles.
Photo: Jemal Countess/Wireimage"

Jerry Mitchell (center)
with the cast of La Cage aux Folles

Jerry Mitchell (center) in
workshop rehearsals for
Never Gonna
Dance
with Noah Racey
and Nancy Lemenager
|
If one flips too quickly through the Playbill, there's
the chance of mistaking the bio of Tony Award-winning
choreographer Jerry Mitchell for the synopsis of a
Broadway show. It has all the pathos of a classic
bootstraps musical: High School football injury sidelines
Midwestern kid into small town dance studio. Kid shows
promise and moves to big city where he finds himself
dancing on a drum as the Indian in "The Will Rogers
Follies." He parlays this intimate knowledge of
loin-clothed dancing into the creation of an annual strip
show franchise called "Broadway Bares" which goes on to
raise 3.5 million dollars to fight AIDS over the next
15-years.
His own career moves from chorus line to choreography
as he racks up prestige gigs alongside heavyweights like
Agnes de Mille, Jerome Robbins and Michael Bennett. His
first Tony nomination--along with his subsequent tuxedo
fetish--comes for "The Full Monty" in 2001, followed by
"Hairspray" in 2003 and "Never Gonna Dance" in 2004. He
also begins to work in television and film, picking up an
Emmy nomination for his contributions to "The Drew Carey
Show" along the way.
He finally breaks his "Broadway's Susan Lucci" streak
in 2005 as a double nominee for both "Dirty Rotten
Scoundrels" and "La Cage aux Follies," but he's almost
not in his seat when his name is called as the winner for
"La Cage." No, he's not in the bathroom. This is a
bootstrap musical, after all, one that finds him back
home with his family in Paw Paw, Michigan, on the day of
the Tony Awards.
These days, statuette securely on mantle, Mitchell
finds himself bowing as a director, in addition to his
duties as choreographer, with the upcoming Broadway
musical version of "Legally Blonde." We caught up with
Jerry just before that show's first Equity table read and
he cited inspirations as varied as Ginger Rogers and the
"Holla Back" video, had a few choice words for "The New
York Times" and found the boundaries of the ever-changing
commercial theater taking him next to Las Vegas, where
he's sure to continue his winning streak.
Tony Phillips: So, Jerry, where have you been all
day?
Jerry Mitchell: I was just in a rehearsal space working
with the writers on "Legally Blonde" and I was running a
little late there.
So how's that going?
It's going brilliantly. It's very exciting. Laura Bell
Bundy just arrived yesterday so we spent some time
together just giving her a head start because the part of
Elle Woods is kind of like Tracy in "Hairspray." I mean,
she just steps onto the stage and she never leaves. We
start with everybody on Monday. I have 19 actors for one
of those 29-hour Equity readings. We're going to read it
for the very first time and hear the first and second
act. This is the first time I'm the
director/choreographer, so it's just crazy.
So what did you send Laura home with? I know you're
a great believer in homework.
Well, Laura is the hardest working woman in show
business. That girl is amazing. We gave her seven numbers
today. She's there still, now, working with the musical
director pounding out the notes to get her a little more
familiar with it.
I ask about the homework because I remember being
up at William Ivey Long's house when you two were working
together on "Never Gonna Dance" and there were just
stacks of videos from you sitting on top of the VCR.
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. But for that show, certainly,
there was a style of things that we had to adhere to in
order to find the show in costumes and movement,
especially the dresses for Ginger Rogers. I think he was
probably watching some of my favorite Fred and Ginger
numbers, which I had pre-edited myself and put on my
Macintosh and would take with me to rehearsal every day
just to look at the way they flowed. I'm a collector of
visual imagery. I collect pictures and paintings and if
there are DVDs out there that pertain to the period or
the year, I do a lot of that. With "Hairspray," there was
a show called "Twist" on DVD of the early 60s and The
Peppermint Lounge and all that stuff. It was very helpful
in research.
There are so many "Twist" movies, though. It's like
its own franchise. I'm surprised you ever got through
them all.
This was a DVD that someone did that was a
documentary. It was called "Twist" and it's really about
the period. It was very helpful, especially for the kids
who I was casting who were 20-years younger than I am and
had no idea what the early 60s were. I mean, I was born
in '60, so I barely remember the late ‘60s, but
"Hairspray" was all about being in 1962, as John Waters
once said, "Before Kennedy was shot." Well, I don't even
remember Kennedy being shot. My brothers do, but I don't.
In this instance, with "Legally Blonde," I collected
everything from Abercrombie & Fitch catalogs to the "Holla
Back" video, which is just brilliant. It's so Elle Woods.
We have a number, actually. In the movie, she sends a
video for her admissions to Harvard, but in the stage
show she actually comes and makes an appearance. She
busts in on the Harvard board. She says, "Essays are
boring, I thought I'd appear in person." Then she brings
in the entire Harvard marching band and says, "Please
admit me." It's a little Dainty June. Dainty June mixed
with "Holla Back," if you can imagine.
Of course I can. Now speaking of "Gypsy" meets Gwen
Stefani, Flo and I saw you in the park the other day with
the "Mad Hot Ballroom" kids. What do you make of this
whole resurgence of social dancing?
I thought the film was amazing. I went to see it with
Eric [Schuur, his partner]. I didn't really get emotional
watching the film until the very end. It reminded me,
strangely enough, of the same feeling I got when I saw
"Billy Elliot" about myself, which was, I was very young
and I loved to dance and I did it in theater in my
hometown and around, but I had a teacher when I was a
kid. I was in sports and everything and I wouldn't take
dance classes, but I performed with the Paw-Paw Village
Players. She choreographed the shows, but she also had
the local dance studio and she kept inviting me to come
take classes. I was like nine or ten, and I wouldn't go.
So she obviously saw something in me that I didn't even
know I had myself until I was fifteen and I broke my
collarbone playing football on the way home from
practice. Then I thought, okay, now I'll take lessons,
because I had enough confidence that I didn't care if
people thought I was gay. It didn't matter anymore. I
felt like I was well liked and it didn't really matter
and I wanted to go take dance lessons. So then I went.
And these kids in "Mad Hot Ballroom," from the beginning
of the film to the end of the film, you can see their
character change. You can see how it affected them as a
person, and that's what's so rewarding. Because
dancers--truly dancers, people who studied dance--you
can't squelch their spirit. If they're truly a dancer--if
they're a dancer in their heart, whether they ever are as
a performer--it's the kind of spirit where you have to
prevail. That's what dancers do.
I saw "Mad Hot Ballroom" at Sundance last year. It
was one of the Slamdance movies. There was also that
Ballet Russes doc and Maria Tomei in that "Marilyn
Hotchkiss' Ballroom Dancing and Charm School" movie at
Sundance. So I left Park City thinking, wow, this is
going to be a huge year for dance movies, but that didn't
seem to happen. TV, on the other hand, seems to be where
dance is happening this year. What do you make of all
these "American Idol"-type shows for dance?
I've been asked, actually, to judge one and to
choreograph another one and, you know, I haven't really
watched them, but I don't watch any TV. I watch so little
television. The only thing I watch is "Law & Order"
because it's the best storytelling ever. But literally, I
never watch TV. I think that dance is always something
that gets audiences juiced because it's like flying for
normal people. Dance is something that everyone wants to
do. It's like a dancer wanting to fly like a bird. That's
the parallel.
Jerry, I feel like you're hinting that we might be
seeing some fly wires in "Legally Blonde." And you're
scaring me!
[Laughs] Oh, no. You'll have to go to "Tarzan" for
that.
If I remember correctly, you're sort of anti this
whole helicopters landing onstage and chandeliers
crashing down crap?
Well, I'm about story. I mean, "Light in the Piazza,"
I was so incredibly moved by that show because I thought
the storytelling was so well done. Whatever the show is,
if the story is good, people will enjoy it. And that's
really what I try to do. Choreography has to tell the
story also. And it has to be appropriate to the
characters that are doing it. And that's a big part of
what I do.
That brings up two things that I want to talk to
you about. The first is the difference between directing
and choreographing and what doing both is like? Are you
wearing two hats, or is it really the same thing anyway?
It is the same thing. Choreographers are directors;
they just do it with movement.
That sounds like a bumper sticker.
It is, but that's the way that I approach it. I'm
directing people to try and tell a story and using my
vocabulary. My written words are steps. The Michael
Jordan number in "The Full Monty" was about five guys
learning to dance using sentences that would actually
come out of their mouths or physical movements that would
actually come out of their bodies. That's the way it
works. Robbins said if you do a double pirouette onstage
and you're turned out and you've got your foot in passé,
you better be a person who is either studying dance or
the instructor, otherwise you have no right doing a
double pirouette and turned out passé in a Broadway show.
That's the truth of it.
Those three shows you just mentioned all come from
different source material that's not written for the
stage. And not just "Legally Blonde," but especially
"Hairspray." That's kind of the "Victor/Victoria" story
with the movie, then the musical and now the movie of the
musical. What do you make of where the piece comes from?
I don't care where the piece comes from. I don't care
if it comes from somebody's drunken binge on my terrace
or if it comes from a movie that I saw last week. The
truth is that we're a society in general that doesn't
read as many books as we used to. I think it's much
easier to get footage on DVD and we share them much more
quickly so they're latched onto in a much faster way. I
don't think that's good or bad; I think it's the way it
is. And we all have to know that that is the way it is,
and that it's going to be a part of the society that we
live in. I don't have the energy or time to change the
way that people get their information, or any interest.
The only thing that interests me is how I get my
information and what stories I choose to tell and
translate on a stage, and hopefully I'm capable of doing
it in a good way.
Well, what's the difference, and maybe you could
talk about that in terms of "Hairspray" or "Jeffrey" or
something that you've worked on that's been both a movie
and stage show?
There's no difference! There was no difference in
"Imaginary Friends" or "Full Monty" or "Hairspray." Jack
O'Brien and I approached each project in exactly the same
way. "Dirty Rotten Scoundrels," same thing. And as we're
working with Marc Shaiman and Scott Whitman now on "Catch
Me If You Can," the idea is you're trying to tell a
story. The theater is a different medium than film and
it's a different medium than someone writing it on a page
and putting it in a book. We're using the tools that the
theatrical stage offer to tell the story and that a
musical offers when a character can actually sing what
they're feeling and it can move a story forward. I don't
even want to get into the way that people are arguing
over theater and whether it's alive or dead. It's very
much alive. And the year is 2005 and it's going to be
alive in 2015 and it's going to be alive in 2025, but
there's one thing you can count on, and that's change.
Are you okay with that?
I'm very okay with that. I embrace change. Out of
change will come some other way of telling a story. I
don't think anyone is going to say that Julie Taymor's
decision to do "The Lion King" was terrible, artless and
uninspired. I wouldn't use any of those adjectives to
describe what she did--quite the opposite--so everyone is
different; everybody has a different way of approaching
their work. And I welcome it all and I look forward to
seeing it all. The truth of it is, if the story is well
told; the public will enjoy seeing it. And that's what I
took away from "Light in the Piazza" and it was inspiring
to me because not only was it well told, but also the
actors in the piece are so incredibly committed. Now, I
just saw it recently, so I know that a show evolves, you
know? Even when I returned to "Dirty Rotten Scoundrels"
to see where they are after their opening night, it's
phenomenal. John Lithgow and Norbert Leo Butz are amazing
together right now. They are breathing like one body
onstage. It's breathtaking to watch.
I remember on Tony night, I was across the street
in that sort of green room, and reporters were watching
on monitors while at the same time people were coming
through the press area after they won and making
speeches. And your speech was so wonderful, but there was
this moment in the speech where you dropped Paw Paw and
there was an immediate ripple through the room. People
were falling over each other. "What's that?" "How do you
spell that?" And I got very haughty and finally yelled,
"Paw Paw, Michigan, people. Come on, try and keep up!"
Well, I was in Paw Paw that morning. I had been with
my family, as I said, and my nephew was graduating. He's
my middle brother's youngest son from his first marriage.
Both of my brothers have two kids and this was the last
of that batch. Now my middle brother has a little baby
girl, but that's the next batch, she's got a long way to
go. So this was the last of that batch and everybody in
the family was home and I just couldn't miss it. And then
I found out that it was going to be the exact same
weekend as the Tonys and because of last year's number
that I did, they asked me if I would come and help them
with the opening number and help them get that on stage.
So I did that and then left that in the hands of my
assistant, Denis Jones, and I said, "Look, I gotta go
home for this graduation." Then my flight home got
cancelled Sunday morning and I got on the second flight,
but, of course, I missed the dress rehearsal that day.
Still, I'm fortunate in this business. I know a lot of
people in this business who have been absolutely disowned
by their family, but I have been so embraced by my
family, by everyone in my family, from the moment I
decided to do this. And no one is in my family is in the
theater, in the arts, in the business, and they've all
become huge supporters of it and huge fans of mine. And
they're the ones, when something happens to me like
winning a Tony Award, it really means more to them than
it does to me. And I'm not saying it doesn't mean
something to me, it means a great deal to me, but to be
able to share that with my family--and they're still
alive--my mother and my father are still alive, so it was
just an amazing event.
Have you been able to digest that night at all?
I've digested that night, and the past five years,
from the first time I was nominated for a Tony Award. The
truth of the matter is that I never really wanted or
expected to be nominated, let alone win a Tony Award. It
was never a goal of mine to win a Tony Award until I
actually got nominated for "The Full Monty," which was my
first nomination. It was an amazing honor and it made me
wake up to a whole new level or plateau in my career. I
thought, Oh God, I could win a Tony Award someday. It
really wasn't something I'd thought about. And then, of
course, it was all I could think about after I'd been
nominated the first time. There was some press things
this particular year that I thought were incredibly
unfair to the choreographic community.
What do you mean?
Well, there was that piece in The Times that said
there was no choreography on Broadway this year. And then
Jack [O'Brien] wrote a letter responding to that in his
work with George Faison and Graziella Danielle and myself
and Rob Marshall and every choreographer he's ever worked
with. You know, I don't expect anyone to understand what
it is I do. The only thing I expect them to do is to
respect what I do as I respect what they do, and unless
you're talented and smart enough and well informed enough
to actually talk about it, it's actually probably better
to stay quiet.
Well, what would you say to The Times to inform
them about what you do?
Go study. Go study dance, go study choreography. Go
find out what it's about.
Which brings us to your background. Where did you
learn to do what you do?
When I was a kid, I learned in my hometown. I started
to learn to dance, but there was something inside of me
that always wanted to be the person that taught and
created the dance, even when I was a kid. I choreographed
all through high school and college. And then I had the
great fortune to get into Broadway shows. I was lucky
enough, for my first Broadway show, to sit next to Agnes
de Mille to understudy the role of Harry Beaton and for
her to teach me and coach me on doing it and what her
original choreography meant. Then I had the opportunity
to work with Jerry Robbins and be his assistant. I
learned his original choreography from "West Side Story,"
"Fiddler on the Roof," "Billion Dollar Baby," "Peter
Pan," everything and had the opportunity to understand
every step and what it meant. What was the storytelling
behind those steps, and what was required in those
musicals for those choreographers to do that. Then I had
the great good fortune to be the assistant to Michael
Bennett for three years and create a new musical with him
that would never be seen by anyone. I choreographed a
good deal of that musical under his tutelage, and for him
to work with me and tell me when the choreography was
good: when it was telling the story and when it wasn't,
was incredible. And then to work with Bob Avian on
"Follies." So I've had this opportunity, and I might be
one of the few choreographers working today who actually
had the opportunity to work with some of the greatest
choreographers of yesterday. And the things that they
told me are the things I keep saying and telling other
people. Choreography is the language in which you dance;
you can't have the character of Riff speak the words of
the character of Billy in "42nd Street." They speak
different words in their body physically. They have a
different vocabulary in dance. You can't expect to go see
"The Full Monty" and see them doing the steps that I
created for "Hairspray." And you wouldn't go see "Light
in the Piazza" and expect to see the steps that were
created for "Dirty Rotten Scoundrels." It's a job that
requires the choreographer to tell the story within the
context of what the whole picture is onstage. Yes, I'd
love to have a dream ballet in every musical I do, but I
have not had one yet that has allowed me to do that. And
guess what? There's not going to be a dream ballet in
"Legally Blonde," and I'm the director.
So do you see a through line to your work, other
than "no dream ballets"?
I hope that my work is about storytelling first and
foremost, and style is not what the work is about. That
was told to me from my dear friend and teacher—someone I
idolized—and his name was Jerome Robbins. He said, if you
have one style, your one style will prevail in everything
that you do. If you have storytelling, your storytelling
will prevail and hopefully all of that storytelling will
be true to what you're creating and that will be a style
in itself, which is good storytelling.
Do you see any limitations to working within the
commercial theater?
No, this is like a whole new phase for me with
"Legally Blonde," to be for the first time in charge of
the entire production. It's so exciting and so thrilling,
no matter what the outcome of the project will be,
because I'm doing it. I have no idea what's going to
happen with the show, and I don't even want to think
about it. All I'm trying to concentrate on is doing the
show and telling a good story and to be entertaining and
to be all of the things that I enjoy when I go see
something at the theater.
Other directors I talk to who come from
choreography all say they couldn't imagine going back to
just choreography. Is that the same with you?
It depends on the collaboration. I think I could work
with Jack on any project as a director, co-director,
choreographer, anything, because we have a sort of
collaboration that I have experienced with no one in this
business. The only thing I have that comes close is my
recent collaboration with Jerry Zaks, who I would also be
excited and thrilled to work with again on another
project. I had wonderful experience with Michael Greif.
I've had wonderful experiences with other directors. But
I feel like on a lot of those levels, I'm ready to take
the musical on as the director also. Every dancer who is
a choreographer transitions into directing. One of the
things that I love about what I do is that I always walk
away from a project having learned something. Hopefully,
I, myself, have grown. That's part of the reason I take a
project on, or because I'm passionate about telling that
story, or impassioned about the characters. I'm either
titillated or thrilled or excited or interested and
there's something I want to share, something I believe
in.
Does this affinity you have for Jack extend to
performers as well? Is there a Jerry Mitchell company
somewhere?
Well, there are so many people in this business that
I'm a fan of and I haven't even had the opportunity to
work with. One of the things that's interesting is the
more work I do and the more casting I do for shows I've
been in or seen, is how when the casting and the
character match and something magical and indescribable
happens on the stage. Certainly Victoria Clark falls into
that category. Certainly Norbert falls into that category
this year. And not just because they won awards, but
because something magical is happening with those people
in those roles. Now we've seen Norbert in "Wicked" and
we've seen Norbert in other things, "Thou Shalt Not," so
the talent was there. That match going off, that moment
when the match goes off and starts to burn, is happening
in "Scoundrels" because the meeting of the actor with the
material is special. As with Victoria, listen, everyone
in "Light in the Piazza" I thought had that. That's what
was one of things that made the storytelling so clear to
me, was that everybody in that cast was phenomenal. I'd
like to think it's true in all of my casts, also, but
it's easier for me to comment on another show.
I guess what I'm asking is what is that spark for
you because there are some actors that you seem to be
working with again and again. In a real practical way,
what can somebody come in and do on an audition that'll
completely blow you out of the water?
You know what, for "Legally Blonde," we saw several
girls for this reading and the thing that blew me away
was when the material matched the actress. And that's not
something you plan on. The thing that I think that you
have to do as a director or a choreographer or the person
on the other side of that table is to remain open to the
possibility. The most important job is to--without
coloring it in any way--watch and see. And when that
happens, it's obvious. It's hard to describe it, but it's
clear.
I guess the other part of that question is what can
someone do in an audition that'll insure you'll be
balancing your checkbook under the table?
[Laughs] You don't have to worry about that. I was
also taught well. With Robbins, you couldn't even bring a
cup of coffee to the table when you were auditioning
people. No eating, no drinking, you must sit there and
give them your full attention. And you know, I gotta tell
you something, when people come to an audition for me, I
take it that they are doing me a favor, and they really
are. First of all, it's ludicrous in our business that
the only way we can find the person is to actually have
them come in and audition. And sometimes huge celebrities
want to do that. I mean John Lithgow, we offered him the
role in "Dirty Rotten Scoundrels," but John wouldn't take
the role until he actually came in and sang the songs
with us and actually had a session because he wanted to
make sure he was the right match. And although we were
all confident that he was, he actually wanted to come in
and sing. And I thought that was so generous of him, but
also so smart of him to know that it is about the match
as much as it is about your ability to do it. So when
actors come in to addition for me, I'm happy that they're
there and I'm happy to give them my undivided attention.
I think an actor really needs to get as much information
about what he's auditioning for before they walk through
the door. In the instance of a character like Elle Woods,
it's simple because you can at least rent the movie and
look at it. You can also go read the original book on
which the movie was based.
I didn't know there was a book!
Oh yes, she wrote a book: a series of letters like a
journal of going to school at Harvard. There was an
actual book. So you can get a lot of information about a
character even if you don't know exactly what that
character is in the script. And I think most of the girls
who came in to audition for me; they knew what they were
doing. They were all dressed in pink, their hair was done
the right way. They're smart, this gang.
You've seen a lot of younger actors for this. And
you certainly worked with a lot of younger actors in
"Hairspray." Do you ever think about what New York is
like for them just economically? I mean, would you be
possible if you were coming up now instead of then?
I have to tell you, they must be doing what I was
doing. I came to New York and I was fortunate. I was in a
Broadway show when I came and I was never not in a
Broadway show. I was in "Brigadoon" when I moved here,
then I went right to "Woman of the Year." Then I went to
out to LA to make the movie of "Whorehouse." I came back
and did "Barnum," then "On Your Toes." I just kept going
from show to show to show and I was always being paid.
And I had to live off that paycheck. For 15-years, I
didn't really save any money. I was basically living and
working in the city hand-to-mouth, but I was fortunate. I
was doing what I wanted to. I wasn't waiting tables. I
was in the business. I don't think everybody's that
fortunate. In fact, I know everybody's not that
fortunate. It's hard. It's a tough business. I saw 1,7000
singer/dancer/actors for the 12 roles in "Dirty Rotten"
and the 12 guys in "La Cage." I cast those two shows in
the same six months. There were 24 parts and I saw over
1,700 people. And 300 of them were friends who came to an
invited call.
So what's going on with the "Hairspray" movie?
Who knows what's going on with the movie? Jack and I
are not doing it anymore.
Really? I didn't know that. Jerry! I have to pick
up the trades once in a while.
[Laughs] Um, yeah…But it was the timing. It got pushed
back from the fall schedule to the spring schedule and
I'm going to be busy with "Legally Blonde." I'm also
going to be busy with a project called "Peep Show," right
now that's the working title. It's a project I'm
developing for Las Vegas with Clear Channel
Entertainment. We're going one phase at a time and I'm
devoting a lot of time to that. It's basically a modern
day burlesque strip show for Las Vegas and it's going to
feature a lot of women.
Now, where did they get that idea?
I know. Why did they call me? [Laughs]. So anyway,
those are two major projects that I'm very invested in
and extremely excited about as well as "Catch Me If You
Can" with Terrance and Marc and Scott and Jack. And Jack
is doing "Coast of Utopia" with Lincoln Center, the Tom
Stoppard trilogy. And, you know, Tom Stoppard and him
have a huge relationship. If would have been lovely to do
the film and I hope it gets done and I hope it's
brilliant. But we're getting ready to do "Hairspray" in
Las Vegas for four-years at the Luxor. I think Harvey's
going to open it. We'll see.
So what would you tell a younger dancer who's
thinking about traveling along this road you're on?
Well, I have four things. I've done a couple of
teaching things and I always say this: the four D's. I
can't even remember who told it to me, but it's so true
to me now, much more so than even when I was young. But
when I think back and think about how I've come this far,
I think it's because I had the four D's: Drive,
Determination, Discipline and Desire. You must have them
all, but the one thing that I find that I am attracted to
when I'm looking at people is the discipline. Do they
study? Do they take class? Do they take voice lessons? Do
they take acting lessons? Are they disciplined? Because
it's not a reality show, we're not dealing with a
one-shot deal to become a star. It's a lot of discipline
that goes into being successful. The other thing I tell
them is every job you do affects the next one. How do you
handle yourself? How do you conduct your professional
self? That will determine whether you get hired the next
time. And I think a lot of kids forget that. You have to
have good attitude, not just attitude.
Alright Jerry, thank you so much for doing this,
and I'm really looking forward to seeing Elle Woods on
Broadway.
Well, it's going to be a while, but it's going to be
worth the wait I hope.

|